Company · /results
Everything below is published by our parent agency and linked in full. Only one of the five is a law firm, it is a personal injury practice rather than a family law one, and none of these numbers is a projection for your firm.
We would rather show you real work in the wrong industry than invent the right one. When we have a family law result worth publishing, it will appear here and it will be linked the same way.
These are case studies published by our parent agency, Ultra SEO Solutions, working since 2009. They are linked so you can read them in full. They are not projections for your firm, and only one of them is a law firm.
We link to these rather than quoting them here. Nothing on this page is a testimonial from a law firm, because we do not have one yet.
No family law case studies yet, so here is the next most useful thing: what the monthly deliverable actually looks like, and how a firm would model the decision.
Placements delivered · July
Illustrative report view
| Date | Type | DA | Live URL | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 07 03 | Guest post | 41 | /how-property-is-divided-in-a-divorce | Live |
| 2026 07 05 | Guest post | 34 | /custody-schedules-what-actually-works | Live |
| 2026 07 09 | Web 2.0 | 58 | /moving-out-before-filing | Live |
| 2026 07 14 | Guest post | 27 | /mediation-or-litigation-what-it-costs | Live |
| 2026 07 18 | Web 2.0 | 62 | /military-pension-division-basics | Live |
Layout of a real monthly report, with host domains redacted for this page. In your report the full URL is clickable. Note what the paths are about: the situational questions, not the terminal keyword.
These describe how the reasoning applies to different kinds of firm. Nobody described below is a client, and none of it is a result.
Competing on divorce, custody and a county name at once. Twenty keyword targets splits across three fronts and covers none of them, which is the case for Platinum rather than Golden. The situational pages carry the reader for weeks; the terminal term may never move in a contested county.
Deliberately filtering shoppers, so raw traffic is the wrong measure. What matters is the consultation to retainer rate on search sourced inquiries, and whether callers arrive having already read something the firm wrote.
A distinct vocabulary around residency and pension division, a searching population that relocates, and very few firms writing for it properly. Narrow, underserved, and cheap to rank relative to the general divorce terms.
These are illustrative scenarios, not client results. No firm described below is a real client.
Model it with your own matter types, fees and volume. The calculator shows the arithmetic on screen and states plainly that it is illustrative rather than a forecast.